Welcome to The Pro Life Campaign Blogspot

Thank you for visiting our blog. We want this to be a rich and informative discussion forum and look forward to your participation. You can visit our website at www.prolifecampaign.ie or email us on info@prolifecampaign.ie







Thursday, April 25, 2013

ABORTION BREAKTHROUGH COALITION PARTIES AGREE THAT NOTHING IS AGREED AS LONG AS NOTHING IS AGREED


It is strange that we have to read between the lines to learn what the news actually is. Despite the so-called decision made by the Government on 18th December 2012 to bring in abortion legislation based on the X case ruling, the news reports seem to suggest that the two Parties are not working together on it and do not even know what each other’s views on it are. 

The abortion legislation is turning into a Titanic facing an increasingly dodgy maiden voyage. 

But while Labour and Fine Gael continue their carefully choreographed dance of disagreement about the arrangement of the numbers on the abortion panels on the deck of the Titanic, the iceberg of the evidence presented by the psychiatrists at the Oireachtas Hearings held by this Government lies in wait for them, made all the more dangerous by their shared refusal to look at any more than the tip of it. 

But there is it, in reality – the real problem with abortion panels is that abortion is not a psychiatric treatment for suicidality. That is why the proposed legislation has to be dropped. Bad medicine makes bad law. 

Shilly-shallying about how many should decide a nonsense is a nonsense squared. No panel is small enough or large enough to turn abortion into a legitimate psychiatric treatment for suicidality. 

The problem is that the thinking underpinning the X case ruling was wrong and the Government has to snap out of its denial. 

The solution is to face that fact and drop that approach.


Joe McCarroll

Saturday, March 16, 2013

New data: 330 million abortions carried out in China since 1971


Nearly 330 million abortions have been performed in China in the past 40 years, official data shows.
Data posted on the health ministry website shows that from 1971 through 2010 a total of 328.9 million abortions were carried out in the country. 
A quarter of Chinese women of reproductive age have had at least one abortion. 
China says that its One Child Policy introduced in the early 1980s has prevented overpopulation, but the policy has led to horrifying practices of forced abortion. Women are forcibly removed from their homes and their babies aborted against their will. Some of these cases have involved women as far along as 9 months in their pregnancies. 

In 2009, there were 35,000 forced abortions performed on Chinese women every day.  


Human rights groups have criticised these harsh enforcement methods. Groups like Women's Rights Without Frontiers and activists like Reggie Littlejohn and Chen Guangcheng are attempting to attract international attention on these human and civil rights abuses. 

Reggie Littlejohn

The One Child Policy has also contributed to the practice of gendercide. With a cultural preference for boys, and the freedom to only have one child, many parents abort female children, or commit infanticide shortly after birth. This has led to a great imbalance, with 120 males born for every 100 girls.  
Despite increasing international outrage, the Chinese Government is resistant to abolishing the One Child Policy. Women's Rights Without Frontiers and other groups are extremely concerned that no significant changes appear to be on the horizon for the One Child Policy. Recent statements by Wang Xia, the Chairman of the National Population and Family Planning Commission, the China "must unwaveringly adhere to the One Child Policy as a national policy" indicate that the current system of coerced and violence enforcement and forced abortions will continue for some time. 

Friday, March 8, 2013

PLC calls Government’s decision on abortion “highly objectionable” for ignoring the evidence from the Oireachtas hearings


Responding to reports that the Government has told the Council of Europe that it will enact legislation for the X case before the end of July, Dr Ruth Cullen of the Pro Life Campaign said:

“It is also unacceptable the way the Government is acting as though it is obliged to introduce abortion on foot of the European court decision in A, B and C v. Ireland. The ECHR called on Ireland to clarify its position regarding treatment of women in pregnancy. It did not compel us to introduce abortion as members of government continue to imply." 

“The Pro Life Campaign will intensify its campaign in the coming weeks to present to the public the true reality of what X case legislation would mean in practice.”

“The Government’s plan to press ahead with legislation for the X case is highly objectionable since the argument that abortion is a treatment for suicidal ideation was completely undermined by the expert psychiatric evidence at the recent Oireachtas hearings on the issue. Far from helping women, abortion increases the risk of future mental health problems for a significant number of women. It is a disgrace how senior members of the Government are choosing to ignore this reality." 

Your TDs and Senators need to hear from you. Order postcards here - http://www.prolifecampaign.ie/postcard-campaign.htm - to tell them that you don't want abortion legalised along the grounds of the X Case.


The recent pro-life vigil in January.

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

New 60-year review of Irish maternal deaths show no suicides because of pregnancy

No evidence that suicide is a treatment for pregnant suicidal women - Government must not mislead women that abortion prevents suicide


A new and groundbreaking study of every maternal death that occurred in Dublin's three maternity hospitals between 1950 and 2011 has found that no woman died by suicide because she was pregnant.
The study, on suicide in pregnancy, examined the Mater's Reports relating to over 1 million pregnant women linked to the three Dublin maternity hospitals.
It shows that in total there were 394 maternal deaths. Of these, 5 died by suicide - one died during pregnancy (at 30 weeks gestation), while four died shortly after giving birth.
Vitally and crucially, the data, obtained from these reports, shows that the five women who died by suicide did NOT do so because of their pregnancy but because of problems external to it such as mental illness.
Importantly in the context of the present debate, the records cover a period that begins almost 20 years before the liberalisation of the British abortion laws in 1967.
This makes it much harder to claim that suicidal pregnant women in the first part of the period under examination were going to Britain for abortions.



The study was carried out by Professor Patricia Casey, of UCD and the Mater Misericoradiae University hospital. She is an internationally recognised researcher and clinical practitioner in the area of suicide and self-harm. 

Prof Casey said: "It demonstrates that suicide in pregnancy is extremely rare and suicide as a result of the pregnancy itself, as distinct from some other social or health problem that preceded the pregnancy or developed during the pregnancy, is unheard of."

"It is thus misleading to suggest that abortion is necessary to prevent suicide in pregnancy, a view that was confirmed by the perinatal psychiatrists at the Heath Committee hearings on abortion in January. They confirmed that they had never seen a case where abortion was the only intervention to treat a pregnant suicidal woman,” Prof Casey said.
She also pointed to the written submission of St. Patrick's Hospital to the Committee, which also stated that there is no evidence supporting the view that abortion is a treatment for any mental health problem or behaviour.

Professor Casey also drew attention to the written submission of Professor Kevin Malone, Professor of Psychiatry at UCD and St. Vincent's Hospital, and a leading international researcher in the field of suicide risk and prediction, who wrote that suicide cannot be predicted with any degree of accuracy that would satisfy a legislative test.

He also expressed concern that legislating for abortion on the grounds of suicide risk “inexplicably legitimizes and normalizes "suicidality" under certain conditions - for women only”. This, he said, would have the unintended consequence of exacerbating the risk of suicide among men.
Professor Casey said that the Government, by its laws, must not ask psychiatry to mislead women in believing that abortion prevents suicide.

“It is imperative that any decision on the resolution of the Government’s issue in relation to the X case must be based on medical research and evidence. The clinical facts and international experience clearly show that legislation, no matter how limited, actually promotes widespread abortion.

“As a doctor with many years of experience of health services in Ireland and the UK, I know that, for any given service, the volume of any treatment provided is most closely correlated with its availability. Once the service is available, it will be used,” she said.

Read a report about the study in today's Irish Independent here

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Sizeable majority support legal protection of unborn, according to new research

Today, the Pro Life Campaign launched a recently commissioned Millward Brown opinion poll, which was carried out on various pro-life issues including current medical practice on the treatment of women in pregnancy.

Áine Ascough, Wendy Grace, Maria Ó hAodha, and Claire Moore at the launch.

Research was carried out between 16-25 January 2013 on a nationally representative sample of 970 people aged 18+ by face-to-face interviews. The findings show a high level of support for current medical practice in Ireland.

Q1. In current medical practice in Ireland, the doctor treats the expectant mother and her baby as two patients and does his/her best to safeguard both in a crisis situation. Do you consider that this practice should be protected and safeguarded by law or not?

Result
66% answered YES 
15% NO 
19% gave no opinion 
Of those who expressed an opinion 81% answered YES.          
                            
Q2. Are you in favour of, or opposed to constitutional protection for the unborn that prohibits abortion but allows the continuation of the existing practice of intervention to save a mother's life in accordance with Irish medical ethics?

Result
63% answered YES
19% NO 
18% gave no opinion 
Of those who expressed an opinion: 77% answered YES.
What marks these findings out from other research is the way important ethical distinctions are clarified for the benefit of respondents.

A number of polls published recently citing support for abortion used the word “abortion” in the question without defining just what it meant. These questions could only lead to uninformed answers. Polls using lists of emotive circumstances also tend to distort results.
In the Millward Brown polls published today an attempt was made to differentiate between life-saving medical interventions in pregnancy and induced abortion (where the sole aim is to terminate the pregnancy). It is clear from the results that a sizeable majority supports legal protection for the unborn child, while ensuring that women receive all necessary medical treatments when pregnant.

The findings published today challenge the notion that there is broad middle ground support for abortion in Ireland.



Separate from the survey results, but very relevant to the debate on abortion, Caroline Simons (legal adviser to the Pro Life Campaign) made the following remarks at the press launch today: 

 ·         As the latest World Health Organisation report on Trends in Maternal Mortality shows, out of 171 countries, Ireland is consistently in the top five in safety for women in pregnancy over the past 25 years. This is a remarkable statistic showing Ireland to be a world leader in maternal healthcare and safer for women in pregnancy than places like Britain and the US, where abortion is available on demand.
·         Rather than introducing an abortion regime that blurs crucial ethical distinctions, the Government should set about reassuring the public on Ireland's outstanding record of care in protecting women during pregnancy.
·         The European Court of Human Rights judgment in A, B and C v. Ireland does not oblige the Government to introduce abortion legislation. Instead, Guidelines could be drawn up in consultation with the appropriate bodies of expertise within the medical profession based on best medical practice, addressing the requirement of clarity for women in pregnancy.
·         Any legislation based on the X case would mean that for the first time members of the Oireachtas would be sanctioning the taking of innocent human life. Once that principle is conceded, there is no going back. Not only would legislation based on the X case put the right to life of the unborn at risk, it would also potentially put women's lives at risk based on the independent expert evidence presented to the recent Oireachtas hearings. This evidence highlighted the link between induced abortion and adverse mental health consequences for women. If we are genuinely concerned about women's health, the Government simply cannot ignore this peer-reviewed evidence. 

You can see the full results from Millward Brown by following this link

Please share this post on facebook and twitter. 

Monday, February 18, 2013

Fianna Fáil leader opposed to abortion being legalised on basis of suicidality


In an interview with TheJournal.ie, Fianna Fáil leader Mícheál Martin has expressed his opposition to abortion being legalised on the grounds of suicidality, as well as opposing widening grounds for cases of rape and poor pre-natal diagnoses.

In July, Mícheál Martin wrote an opinion piece in the Irish Examiner that set out his opposition to legislation based on X. You can see our blog from July by clicking here.

Mícheál Martin, leader of Fianna Fáil

The Cork Deputy is one of an increasing number of politicians, doctors, and commentators who are concerned by the prospect of abortion being legalised on the flawed basis of treating suicidality - a claim that was completely demolished at the recent Oireachtas Health Committee Hearings, when all the consultant psychiatrists that went before it testified that abortion is not a treatment for a pregnant woman who is suicidal.